Hi Erno, Just looking for a little more information here. What are the particular areas around keystone integration in the v2 api+registry stack that you want to test? Is the v2 api + v2 registry stack using keystone differently than how v1 api + v1 registry stack uses it?
Thanks On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Erno Kuvaja <kuv...@hp.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been trying to enable functional testing for Glance API v2 using > data_api = glance.db.registry.api without great success. > > The current functionality of the v2 api+reg relies on the fact that > keystone is used and our current tests does not facilitate that expectation. > > I do not like either option I have managed to come up with so now is time > to call for help. Currently only way I see we could run the registry tests > is to convert our functional tests using keystone instead of noauth or > write test suite that passes API server and targets the registry directly. > Neither of these are great as starting keystone would make the already long > taking functional tests even longer and more resource hog on top of that we > would have a need to pull in keystone just to run glance tests; on the > other hand bypassing API server would not give us any guarantee that the > behavior of the glance is the same regardless which data_api is used. > > At this point any ideas/discussion would be more than welcome how we can > make these tests running on both configurations. > > Thanks, > Erno > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
