+1 on porting the templates.
What I would suggest also is to restructure the heat-templates directory
layout. Most of the templates are not so different between OS distros.
Besides this, what the heat-templates project really helps is that the
templates are the best teaching materials for new users. Having them
stored in sub-directories named by the OS distro is confusing.
Maybe we can consider organize them like what we did for the test cases:
- most templates are no more than demonstrating only one or two
features;
- a template may have a variant only when the changes needed for
running on another OS distro are significant;
- in template comments, the author is expected to record on which
distros it has been tested;
- there could be template groups that can be placed into a dedicated
subdirectory -- the templates/scripts are supposed to be used
together
BTW, did I missed the conclusion from the 'heatr' discussion?
Regards,
Qiming
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:54:51AM +0200, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
> > From: Steven Dake <sd...@redhat.com>
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: 16/04/2014 01:43
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] computed package names?
> >
> > On 04/15/2014 03:45 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > > On 15/04/14 17:59, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> > >> Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote on 04/15/2014 05:17:21 PM:
> > >> > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-04-15 13:32:30 -0700:
> > >> >
> > >> > > FWIW, in the short term I'm not aware of any issue with
> installing
> > >> > > mariadb in Fedora 17/18, provided that mysql is not installed
> > >> first. And
> > >> > > in fact they're both EOL anyway, so we should probably migrate
> > >> all the
> > >> > > templates to Fedora 20 and mariadb.
> > >> >
> >
> > The last time I tried F17 images, the database installation step failed
> > miserably because of problems in the base distribution.
> >
> > >> > +1 for that.
> > >>
> > >> I count 22 templates in heat-templates that are written to support
> > >> Fedora, Ubuntu, and RHEL; is MariaDB available in those? I do not see
> > >> it in Ubuntu 12.10, for example.
> > >
> > > I imagine it's a problem for RHEL (can RHEL 7 just get released
> > > already?). Ubuntu is not an issue though, unless they have adopted yum
> > > while I was not looking.
> > >
> > > Checking a random sample, they only includes "yum" and "systemd"
> > > sections (no "apt" or "sysvinit") in the metadata, so the purported
> > > support for Ubuntu 10.04 is just due to copy-paste and isn't actually
> > > implemented.
> > >
> > > There is, I thought, one template that does actually support Ubuntu.
> > > Stuff in the "F17" directory is there for a reason.
> > >
> > The only rational reason for having the F17 directory is because nobody
> > has done the work of porting these templates to F20. That work needs to
> > be done before we can remove the F17 directory permanently :)
>
> +1 on porting existing templates to current distros. And it would be even
> better to start using some of the new features like software config.
> I have actually started on a WordPress example that uses software config
> and should be to post this for review soon.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > -steve
> >
> > > - ZB
> > >
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
