On 15/04/14 17:59, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote on 04/15/2014 05:17:21 PM:
 > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-04-15 13:32:30 -0700:
 >
 > > FWIW, in the short term I'm not aware of any issue with installing
 > > mariadb in Fedora 17/18, provided that mysql is not installed
first. And
 > > in fact they're both EOL anyway, so we should probably migrate all the
 > > templates to Fedora 20 and mariadb.
 >
 > +1 for that.

I count 22 templates in heat-templates that are written to support
Fedora, Ubuntu, and RHEL; is MariaDB available in those?  I do not see
it in Ubuntu 12.10, for example.

I imagine it's a problem for RHEL (can RHEL 7 just get released already?). Ubuntu is not an issue though, unless they have adopted yum while I was not looking.

Checking a random sample, they only includes "yum" and "systemd" sections (no "apt" or "sysvinit") in the metadata, so the purported support for Ubuntu 10.04 is just due to copy-paste and isn't actually implemented.

There is, I thought, one template that does actually support Ubuntu. Stuff in the "F17" directory is there for a reason.

- ZB

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to