Thanks Soren, you are correct! Yay Timezones Vish
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Soren Hansen <so...@linux2go.dk> wrote: > 2100 UTC is 1 PM Pacific. :-) > > Den 29/01/2014 17.01 skrev "Vishvananda Ishaya" <vishvana...@gmail.com>: > I apologize for the confusion. The Wiki time of 2100 UTC is the correct time > (Noon Pacific time). We can move tne next meeting to a different day/time > that is more convienient for Europe. > > Vish > > > On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Florent Flament > <florent.flament-...@cloudwatt.com> wrote: > > > Hi Vishvananda, > > > > I would be interested in such a working group. > > Can you please confirm the meeting hour for this Friday ? > > I've seen 1600 UTC in your email and 2100 UTC in the wiki ( > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Hierarchical_Multitenancy_Meeting > > ). As I'm in Europe I'd prefer 1600 UTC. > > > > Florent Flament > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Vishvananda Ishaya" <vishvana...@gmail.com> > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 7:35:15 PM > > Subject: [openstack-dev] Hierarchicical Multitenancy Discussion > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I apologize for the obtuse title, but there isn't a better succinct term to > > describe what is needed. OpenStack has no support for multiple owners of > > objects. This means that a variety of private cloud use cases are simply > > not supported. Specifically, objects in the system can only be managed on > > the tenant level or globally. > > > > The key use case here is to delegate administration rights for a group of > > tenants to a specific user/role. There is something in Keystone called a > > “domain” which supports part of this functionality, but without support > > from all of the projects, this concept is pretty useless. > > > > In IRC today I had a brief discussion about how we could address this. I > > have put some details and a straw man up here: > > > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy > > > > I would like to discuss this strawman and organize a group of people to get > > actual work done by having an irc meeting this Friday at 1600UTC. I know > > this time is probably a bit tough for Europe, so if we decide we need a > > regular meeting to discuss progress then we can vote on a better time for > > this meeting. > > > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Hierarchical_Multitenancy_Meeting > > > > Please note that this is going to be an active team that produces code. We > > will *NOT* spend a lot of time debating approaches, and instead focus on > > making something that works and learning as we go. The output of this team > > will be a MultiTenant devstack install that actually works, so that we can > > ensure the features we are adding to each project work together. > > > > Vish > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
