For those of you in Europe, I would appreciate your attendance at 2100 UTC if you can make it. I know this is a bad time for you, so I will also jump in #openstack-meeting-alt on Friday at 1600 UTC. We can have an impromptu discussion there so I can incorporate your knowledge and feedback into the 2100 meeting.
Thanks! Vish On Jan 29, 2014, at 7:59 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya <vishvana...@gmail.com> wrote: > I apologize for the confusion. The Wiki time of 2100 UTC is the correct time > (Noon Pacific time). We can move tne next meeting to a different day/time > that is more convienient for Europe. > > Vish > > > On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Florent Flament > <florent.flament-...@cloudwatt.com> wrote: > >> Hi Vishvananda, >> >> I would be interested in such a working group. >> Can you please confirm the meeting hour for this Friday ? >> I've seen 1600 UTC in your email and 2100 UTC in the wiki ( >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Hierarchical_Multitenancy_Meeting >> ). As I'm in Europe I'd prefer 1600 UTC. >> >> Florent Flament >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Vishvananda Ishaya" <vishvana...@gmail.com> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 7:35:15 PM >> Subject: [openstack-dev] Hierarchicical Multitenancy Discussion >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I apologize for the obtuse title, but there isn't a better succinct term to >> describe what is needed. OpenStack has no support for multiple owners of >> objects. This means that a variety of private cloud use cases are simply not >> supported. Specifically, objects in the system can only be managed on the >> tenant level or globally. >> >> The key use case here is to delegate administration rights for a group of >> tenants to a specific user/role. There is something in Keystone called a >> “domain” which supports part of this functionality, but without support from >> all of the projects, this concept is pretty useless. >> >> In IRC today I had a brief discussion about how we could address this. I >> have put some details and a straw man up here: >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy >> >> I would like to discuss this strawman and organize a group of people to get >> actual work done by having an irc meeting this Friday at 1600UTC. I know >> this time is probably a bit tough for Europe, so if we decide we need a >> regular meeting to discuss progress then we can vote on a better time for >> this meeting. >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Hierarchical_Multitenancy_Meeting >> >> Please note that this is going to be an active team that produces code. We >> will *NOT* spend a lot of time debating approaches, and instead focus on >> making something that works and learning as we go. The output of this team >> will be a MultiTenant devstack install that actually works, so that we can >> ensure the features we are adding to each project work together. >> >> Vish >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
