On 12/19/2013 05:32 PM, Jordan O'Mara wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> So basically this is our first proposal what we send out: >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/022196.html >> >> After Horizon meetings, several e-mails and also couple of other >> discussions of people who are for/against codebase merge, it looks that >> in the end upstream leans towards 'umbrella' solution. >> >> After all, +1 for umbrella solution from my side too. Tuskar UI will get >> closer to the nature of the project (based on Horizon, UI related >> audience). And in the same time, we will not rush things up before the >> project graduates. In Icehouse we can easier reach goals of both - >> Horizon as well as Tuskar UI - and after Icehouse release we can review >> back and get to the codebase merge in the end. >> >> Do you all agree? >> >> -- Jarda > +1, I think this is the most sensible approach.
+1 from me, this approach makes perfect sense. > >> On 2013/18/12 22:33, Gabriel Hurley wrote: >>> From my experience, directly adding incubated projects to the main Horizon >>> codebase prior to graduation has been fraught with peril. That said, the >>> closer they can be together prior to the graduation merge, the better. >>> >>> I like the idea of these types of projects being under the OpenStack >>> Dashboard Program umbrella. Ideally I think it would be a jointly-managed >>> resource in Gerrit. The Horizon Core folks would have +2 power, but the >>> Tuskar core folks would also have +2 power. (I'm 90% certain that can be >>> done in the Gerrit admin...) >>> >>> That way development speed isn't bottlenecked by Horizon Core, but there's >>> a closer tie-in with the people who may ultimately be maintaining it. It >>> becomes easier to keep track of, and can be more easily guided in the >>> right directions. With a little work incubated dashboard components like >>> this could even be made to be a non-gating part of the testing >>> infrastructure to indicate when things change or break. >>> >>> Adding developers to Horizon Core just for the purpose of reviewing an >>> incubated umbrella project is not the right way to do things at all. If >>> my proposal of two separate groups having the +2 power in Gerrit isn't >>> technically feasible then a new group should be created for management of >>> umbrella projects. >>> >>> All the best, >>> >>> - Gabriel >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> -- Regards, Ana Krivokapic Associate Software Engineer OpenStack team Red Hat Inc. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
