----- Original Message ----- > So basically this is our first proposal what we send out: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/022196.html > > After Horizon meetings, several e-mails and also couple of other > discussions of people who are for/against codebase merge, it looks that > in the end upstream leans towards 'umbrella' solution. > > After all, +1 for umbrella solution from my side too. Tuskar UI will get > closer to the nature of the project (based on Horizon, UI related > audience). And in the same time, we will not rush things up before the > project graduates. In Icehouse we can easier reach goals of both - > Horizon as well as Tuskar UI - and after Icehouse release we can review > back and get to the codebase merge in the end. > > Do you all agree? > > -- Jarda
+1, I think this is the most sensible approach. > > On 2013/18/12 22:33, Gabriel Hurley wrote: > > From my experience, directly adding incubated projects to the main Horizon > > codebase prior to graduation has been fraught with peril. That said, the > > closer they can be together prior to the graduation merge, the better. > > > > I like the idea of these types of projects being under the OpenStack > > Dashboard Program umbrella. Ideally I think it would be a jointly-managed > > resource in Gerrit. The Horizon Core folks would have +2 power, but the > > Tuskar core folks would also have +2 power. (I'm 90% certain that can be > > done in the Gerrit admin...) > > > > That way development speed isn't bottlenecked by Horizon Core, but there's > > a closer tie-in with the people who may ultimately be maintaining it. It > > becomes easier to keep track of, and can be more easily guided in the > > right directions. With a little work incubated dashboard components like > > this could even be made to be a non-gating part of the testing > > infrastructure to indicate when things change or break. > > > > Adding developers to Horizon Core just for the purpose of reviewing an > > incubated umbrella project is not the right way to do things at all. If > > my proposal of two separate groups having the +2 power in Gerrit isn't > > technically feasible then a new group should be created for management of > > umbrella projects. > > > > All the best, > > > > - Gabriel > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Jordan O'Mara <jomara at redhat.com> Red Hat Engineering, Raleigh _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
