On 2018-08-22 11:03:43 -0700 (-0700), melanie witt wrote: [...] > I think it's about context. If two separate projects do their own priority > and goal setting, separately, I think they will naturally be more different > than they would be if they were one project. Currently, we agree on goals > and priorities together, in the compute context. If placement has its own > separate context, the priority setting and goal planning will be done in the > context of placement. In two separate groups, someone who is a member of > both the Nova and Placement teams would have to persuade Placement-only > members to agree to prioritize a particular item. This may sound subtle, but > it's a notable difference in how things work when it's one team vs two > separate teams. I think having shared context and alignment, at this point > in time, when we have outstanding closely coupled nova/placement work to do, > is critical in delivering for operators and users who are depending on us. [...]
I'm clearly missing some critical detail about the relationships in the Nova team. Don't the Nova+Placement contributors already have to convince the Placement-only contributors what to prioritize working on? Or are you saying that if they disagree that's fine because the Nova+Placement contributors will get along just fine without the Placement-only contributors helping them get it done? -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
