Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-17 08:01:38 -0800: > Folks, > > The discussion didn't result in a consensus, but it did revealed a great > number of things to be accounted. I've tried to summarize top-level points > in the etherpad [1]. It lists only items everyone (as it seems to me) > agrees on, or suggested options where there was no consensus. Let me know > if i misunderstood or missed something. The etherpad does not list > advantages/disadvantages of options, otherwise it just would be too long. > Interested people might search the thread for the arguments :-) . > > I've thought it over and I agree with people saying we need to move > further. Savanna needs the agent and I am going to write a PoC for it. Sure > the PoC will be implemented in project-independent way. I still think that > Salt limitations overweight its advantages, so the PoC will be done on top > of oslo.messaging without Salt. At least we'll have an example on how it > might look. > > Most probably I will have more questions in the process, for instance we > didn't finish discussion on enabling networking for the agent yet. In that > case I will start a new, more specific thread in the list.
If you're not going to investigate using salt, can I suggest you base your POC on os-collect-config? It it would not take much to add two-way communication to it. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
