On 21/06/17 08:41 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > 2. Enhance dev/non-dev comms. I doubt more meetings will be the solution. > > a. I would suggest projects when doing their planning at Forum or > PTG, always leave a spot for requirement from WGs. And WG chairs > should participate this dev meetings if their WG has done related work. > b. Moreover the foundation could start promotion of project/WG > collaboration best practices, or even specify in the release > document that certain feature are based upon feedback from a certain > WGs. > > c. WG should have cycle-based releases of works so that they got a > sense of timing, no lost in a permanent discussion mode for issues.
agree that we need to stop being so silo'd. i would suggest even more regular feedback rather than a once a cycle data dump at the forum. i don't attend WG meetings/discussions but i'm curious, do the Working Groups have resource to contact the desired PTLs bi-weekly/(some regular interval) to give feedback and discuss requirements? given the lack of resources in community dev teams, i would expect better results if WG members could initiate communication... or go 51% at least :) -- gord __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
