comments inline. On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, > we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various > deployment teams. > > It's clear that we share many common problems, such as patterns for major > version upgrades (even if the workflow isn't identical we've all duplicated > effort e.g around basic nova upgrade workflow recently), container images > and other common building blocks for configuration management. > > Here's a non-exhaustive list of sessions where we had some good > cross-project discussion, and agreed a number of common problems where > collaboration may be possible: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ansible-config-mgt > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-kolla-kubernetes > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-pike-ptg-images > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-fuel-tripleo-integration > > If there is interest in continuing the discussions on a more regular basis, > I'd like to propose we start a cross-project working group: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Category:Working_Groups > > If I go ahead and do this is "deployment" a sufficiently project-neutral > term to proceed with? > > WFM. Anything longer such as "openstack-deployment-tools" doesn't show up very well in IRC clients. Forgive the bikeshedding; "openstack-deploy-tools" is very project-neutral and shows up well in IRC clients. > I'd suggest we start with an informal WG, which it seems just requires an > update to the wiki, e.g no need for any formal project team at this point? > > WFM. Since we aren't really a project team but a collection of projects working together, I don't think we need further formalization. > Likewise I know some folks have expressed an interest in an IRC channel > (openstack-deployment?), I'm happy to start with the ML but open to IRC > also if someone is willing to set up the channel. > > +1 - I think an IRC channel would be the best way for real time communication. > Perhaps we can start by using the tag "deployment" in all cross-project ML > traffic, then potentially discuss IRC (or even regular meetings) if it > becomes apparrent these would add value beyond ML discussion? > > [deploy-tools] may be better unless that breaks people's email clients. I am out of bandwidth personally for meetings, although others may be interested in a meeting. I'm not sure what value a regular meeting would have and would need a chair, which may result in an inability to obtain neutral ground. IMO IRC and ML would be sufficient for this CP effort, however others may have different viewpoints. > Please follow up here if anyone has other/better ideas on how to facilitate > ongoing cross-team discussion and I'll do my best to help move things > forward. > > Sounds good to me. Waiting 3 months to see everyone face to face to discuss cross-project deployment tool collaboration doesn't seem ideal. > Thanks! > > Steve > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
