On 11/22/2013 01:02 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:02:02PM +0100, Ralf Haferkamp wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:33:22PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: >>> On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum >>>> of libvirt 0.9.6. >>> ... >>>> If there are other distros I've missed which expect to support deployment >>>> of Icehouse please add them to this list. Hopefully there won't be any >>>> with libvirt software older than Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.... >>>> >>>> >>>> The reason I'm asking this now, is that we're working to make the libvirt >>>> python module a separate tar.gz that can build with multiple libvirt >>>> versions, and I need to decide how ancient a libvirt we should support >>>> for it. >>> >>> Fantastic!!! >>> >>> The Ubuntu cloud archive >>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive is how OpenStack is >>> delivered by Canonical for Ubuntu LTS users. So I think you can go >>> with e.g. 0.9.11 or even 0.9.12 depending on what the Suse folk say. >> I think 0.9.11 is fine for us. I am not worried too much about 0.9.12 either >> since openSUSE 12.2 (which has 0.9.11) will reach its EOL soon. I also added >> SLES to the table on: >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix > > Thanks, it looks like from the libvirt side, we are only going to be > able to provide a standalone libvirt-python on PyPI that works > back to version 0.9.11. Prior to 0.9.11 libvirt did not install its > API description, which is a pre-requisite for the python bindings > to build. > > Fortunately 0.9.11 lines up with all the distros we've got listed > so far.
I, for one, welcome our new libvirt overlords. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
