Russell Bryant wrote: > On 09/06/2013 08:35 AM, Peter Feiner wrote: >> Russell & Thierry, >> >> I think conductor-workers [1] should be an exception to the feature >> freeze for H3. The risk is very low since the default value of this >> configuration option doesn't change nova's behavior at all. Moreover, >> the patch [2] is small and uses common OpenStack code. The reward is >> high since it makes eliminating a big bottleneck in typical OpenStack >> deployments very simple (e.g., setting [CONDUCTOR] workers=10 in >> nova.conf) [3]. >> >> Thanks! >> Peter >> >> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/condutor-workers >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42342/ >> [3] >> http://blog.gridcentric.com/bid/318277/Boosting-OpenStack-s-Parallel-Performance > > I'm good with this one. The patch is *very* small and the functionality > is off by default, so the risk is incredibly low. We need to do some > reviewing of conductor code to make sure we can't find a reason this > might not work with it, but it seems like it provides a whole lot of > benefit. > > Any other thoughts on this one?
+1. Benefits outweigh drawbacks and AFAICT the patch is ready so disruption is minimal. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
