"Walter A. Boring IV" <walter.bor...@hp.com> wrote on 07/18/2013 12:04:07 AM: <snip> > +1 to Ollie from me. > > +1 to John's points. If a company is colluding with other core > members, from the same company, to do bad things within a project, > it should become pretty obvious at some point and the project's > community should take action. If someone is putting in an extra > effort to provide quality code and reviews on a regular basis, then > why wouldn't we want that person on the team? Besides, being a core > member really just means that you are required to do reviews and > help out with the community. You do get some gerrit privileges for > reviews, but that's about it. I for one think that we absolutely > can use more core members to help out with reviews during the > milestone deadlines :)
Walt, As I said, I really wasn't worried about anyone colluding or doing bad things. As you said, that would be obvious and could be handled. I was concerned about creating a limited view, and I thank you and everyone who replied for easing those concerns. And BTW, I don't think there is an HP conspiracy to take over Cinder and make it FC-only :) Thanks, Avishay _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev