>-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton >Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:51 PM >To: openssl-users@openssl.org >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Licenses... > > >I have an open-source project. It may be compiled with or without >OpenSSL support. If someone compiles it with OpenSSL support, I'm >required to put two (perhaps 3) statements in its documentation. If >they don't, if I put those statements in the documentation, I'm >misrepresenting the source of some of the code. >
Isn't this the same documentation where your also documenting that it can be compiled with OpenSSL or without OpenSSL? How hard is it to explain the OpenSSL licensing conditions apply if this is compiled with OpenSSL, and they don't if it's not? Also I don't think the program documentation qualifies as an "advertising material" thus you don't have to mention it. Ted ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
