Is there any followup to this yet ?

Is any more information required ?

Thanks,

Matt.


>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         DARCY,MATTHEW (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2)  
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:27 PM
> To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:      openssl 9.6g Redhat 7.3 Seg Fault
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have a redhat 7.3 server which came with an openssl-9.6b rpm
> pre-installed.
> 
> I removed this package with rpm -e --nodeps as 1.) this version of openssl
> had bugs/secuirty issues in it 2.) I am not a fan of rpm packages.
> 
> I downloaded the source for openssl-9.6g
> 
> I ran a ./config --prefix=/usr --openssldir=/usr/local/ssl -shared
> which ran ok.
> I then ran a make 
> this ran ok
> I then ran a make test
> this errored with the line
> 
> testing...
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/openssl-0.9.6g/test'
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/openssl-0.9.6g/apps'
> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/openssl-0.9.6g/apps'
> ./destest
> make[1]: *** [test_des] Segmentation fault
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/openssl-0.9.6g/test'
> make: *** [tests] Error 2
> 
> (I have also attatched the file containing the make report)
> 
> I have searched through google and the openssl archives and found 2
> references to similar problem
> 
> 1.) was the same problem with openssl-9.6g although I don't know what OS /
> compiler was being used. (message 12907)
> 2.) was the same problem with openssl-9.4 this was put down to reload1.c
> and reload.c having a small bug in it.
> 
> I am using 
> 
> Redhat 7.3
> 2.4.18 kernel
> openssl-9.6g
> gcc-g77-2.96-110
> gcc-c++-2.96-110
> gcc-2.96-110
> 
> I am open to suggestions on the cause and how to fix it.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Matt.
> 
>  << File: testlog >> 
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to