Dear Mr. Casad, UnixReview published Anne Carasik' article on openssl recently. It should be great for LEGO fan or someone studying history of alcohol. However, this article (at least) give wrong advise and show lack of writer competence. To illustrate it:
- using "-rand /dev/urandom" while RSA key generation will try to read the whole device in and would never stop. One just cant generate RSA keypair with this option - DSA is listed as digest algorithm in Ref.2 - it was said that "DSA uses Diffie-Hellman for key exchange" under "Public Key Generation and Tools" - it was suggested to use GnuPG for public-key operations instead of openssl suitable for illustration only. However, author didnt bother to show howto sign X.509 certificates and Secure Electronic Transactions messages with GnuPG. I'm sure errors list could grow fast and easy. What is UnixReview policy on publishing follow-ups? ----- Forwarded message from Brian Hatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:00:59 -0700 From: Brian Hatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OpenSSL article at unixreview There's an intro OpenSSL article at www.unixreview.com that folks might want to peruse. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Naina library: http://www.unity.net/~vf/naina_r1.tgz ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
