in either case, my "SSL_accept" call returns -1 :(
--- Ruby Cruiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 13:22:40 -0700 (PDT) > From: Ruby Cruiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: "SSL_set_fd" or "SSL_set_bio" ?? > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Should I use "SSL_set_fd" or SSL_set_bio?? How do we > know? I have a socket generated from "accept" call, > which I can feed to both these APIs and they pass. > But > not sure what difference it makes... > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. > http://personals.yahoo.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project > http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
