David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the problem is that TLS is not widly deployed on browsers. until it is > trying to use it for name-based secure servers will be very > problematic. for crying out loud people are still running into problems > with name based normal srvers and that just requires HTTP1.1 IIRC, if > that's still not everywhere how long until TLS is? TLS doesn't support name-based virtual servers either. The only support for name-based virtual servers with HTTP is the HTTP Upgrade technique described in RFC 2817. As far as I know, no major browser or server implements it. -Ekr ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Poetsch, Michael
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Amol Natu
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Vadim Fedukovich
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache... Edwin Chiu
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3... David Lang
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Norman Mackey
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3... Vadim Fedukovich
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache... Michael T. Babcock
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3... David Lang
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache... Eric Rescorla
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Ap... David Schwartz
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: SSL + VirtualH... Michael T. Babcock
- RE: SSL + VirtualH... David Schwartz
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Paulo Matos
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache... tomn
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Ap... Paulo Matos
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Ap... Michael T. Babcock