Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> 
> > I built openssl-0.9.1c under Cygwin/NT; for the most part, it just built,
> > but
> 
> > 1.  I had to undo all the hardcoded paths in the makefiles (e.g. /bin/rm
> >     and /bin/sh)
> 
> The /bin/sh is problematic and should be kept for portability reasons. But for
> the /bin/rm I never saw any reasons, so this we can replace with just "rm"
> IMHO.

Note that the Cygwin installation instructions explicitly recommend that the
user creates a /bin directory with a copy of sh.exe therein.  This is so that
scripts will work without alteration (surprise, surprise!).

> > 2.  use the following Configure "type":
> 
> >     "gcc-NT","gcc:-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 
>-Wall::BN_LLONG $x86_gcc_des $x86_gcc_opts:",
> 
> That's no problem. But it should be better named "Cygnus-NT" to be a little
> bit consistent with the "VC-NT" and "BC-XX" platform names,

There is nothing specific to NT about Cygwin.  A better tag might be
'Cygnus-win32',
or just Cygwin32.
 
Farrell.

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to