you mean like the obsolete libraries that show up with tp SL viewers? Like the one that dumps a bunch of garbage in the root and then does not uninstall them? And that screws up the system forcing you to have to redu windows updates to overwrite the obsolete libs from 2005?
________________________________ From: Nicky Perian <nickyper...@yahoo.com> To: Ann Otoole <missannoto...@yahoo.com>; Brendan Wilson <wolfpu...@earthlink.net>; OpenSource Mailing List <opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com> Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 1:14:14 PM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Libraries, Libraries, Libraries and MS redistribution hell. ________________________________ From: Ann Otoole <missannoto...@yahoo.com> To: Brendan Wilson <wolfpu...@earthlink.net>; OpenSource Mailing List <opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com> Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 12:10:12 PM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Why would anyone be burning time on VS2008 when VS2010 is the current environment? ________________________________ From: Brendan Wilson <wolfpu...@earthlink.net> To: OpenSource Mailing List <opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com> Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 9:00:33 AM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Not yet they have just started working on bring it to VS2008 and even doing that is by a lot of effort from the OS community there even a jira on at least bring it to VS2008(vc90) From:opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com [mailto:opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of Ann Otoole Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:11 AM To: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence); opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Has this project code been brought forward to Visual Studio 2010? ________________________________ From:Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) <o...@lindenlab.com> To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Sent: Fri, September 3, 2010 9:32:54 AM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture On 2010-09-03 9:14, Lawson English wrote: > On 9/2/10 8:13 AM, Talia Tokugawa wrote: >> [...] >> I know this has been suggested before as friends have suggested it. >> Why not make the viewer more Modular? Introduce a plugin architecture. >> Allow any user to "build" their own client that fits their needs and >> requirements. >> > Its a HUGE undertaking to do that. LL wasn't willing to tackle the issue > directly years ago and they probably don't have the resources to do it > now. It would have to be a community-lead effort and I'm not sure that > developers are willing to invest the time to refactor the viewer at that > level unless LL will be willing to seriously consider using the > resulting re-architectured viewer. Try us... _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3113 - Release Date: 09/04/10 02:34:00
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
