Yes, but most viewers have decent legit developers who won't put that stuff on the login page.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Harold Brown <labrat...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I find interesting is that people are neglecting to realize that > ANY viewer, even a LL viewer could have been used to do the same thing > by changing the WEBPAGE the login screen pointed to. Or for that > matter distributing a object using the new Media functions to load a > webpage with the exact same iframe set. > > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:03 AM, David M Chess <ch...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> Could we move all this stuff to a new "emeraldgate" list, or something? >> >> That I could then carefully not subscribe to? >> >> __ >> _______________________________________________ >> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >> privileges >> > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > -- “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - Printcrime by Cory Doctrow Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
