I would love to see emerald continue and grow. I for one actually like emerald. however. I find it odd that 3 of the devs are known for creating copybot/griefer clients. And with emerald alone 2 of the devs have created malicious code inside of emerald. Yet only one of the devs was asked to leave. While mr user data leakage remains on the team. Personally it appears to me that this is nothing more than a set up to shadow or sweep away the dirt that has been being flung around about the viewer. Fractured is asked to step down and walk away. But Fractured is the dev that purchased the license to build emkdu. Phox built the emkdu with user data leakage. And now they will be using a "clean" emkdu. Who is building the emkdu now? Fractured? Phox? of did one of the other devs run out and purchase a license to do so? Changing the server which hosts the client does nothing for saving face. And as long as Phox is a part of the team,(considering the fact that Phox and Jaycool are closer than twins) Fractured will still have access to changing code. If LL allows this to continue the TPVP is a joke. Hopefully the rest of you that use emerald will be more cautious about the client when you run it. After what we have seen thus far.....god only knows whats next. On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:21:35 -0400, Miro Collas <miro.col...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't want to start a war of any kind, but let me suggest that you ask > for evidence before believing what people say in chat or elsewhere. > There are people who would love to see Emerald crumble, and have no > problem deceiving, misleading or plain lying. I have seen this done on > this list, in forums (SLU especially) and in group chat. So, be very > wary of whose word you believe. > > For my part, the interview on treet.tv was enough to convince me to > remain an Emerald user. That combined with knowing Jessica enough to > trust her word. > > On 08/23/2010 04:24 AM, Jesse Barnett wrote: >> Really wish that was true but you saw Katharine's comments in irc. >> Absolutely nothing has changed with Emerald except for the servers. >> Here is hoping that both Philip and legal are not deceived so easily. >> >> Jesse Barnett >> >> On Monday, August 23, 2010, Tateru Nino<tateru.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> And now, perhaps, we can get back to the important stuff, like the >> viewer itself. >> _______________________________________________ >> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >> privileges >> > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
