Good idea! We could even have a directory of people qualified to talk about it who give their RL info so that people show up front which commenters are trustworthy. Any votes for writing this up as the Commenting on the Third Party Viewer Policy Policy, or COTTPVPP?
/snark :) Brent On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Dahlia Trimble <dahliatrim...@gmail.com>wrote: > I also would be interested in seeing those freely offering their legal > advice on this list also describing their qualifications to do so and in > which jurisdictions they are licensed to practice law. If not, then please > add a "IANAL" or other suitable disclaimer, or mention to what level you > would be willing to be responsible for the misfortunes that may happen from > others who may take your advice. > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Joel Foner <joel.fo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I wonder if anyone has an easy way to calculate the actual signal (os-dev >> posts) to noise (legal posts) ratio on this list over, let's say the last 30 >> days. It's getting hard to recall when the last actual os-dev discussion >> happened. Maybe I'm just missing it. >> >> Back to my regularly scheduled programming, as it were. >> >> Joel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >> privileges >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
