Yah, but it might start looking a bit suspicious if it looks like you're using computers as one-time pads, always using a different system for each connection for a certain account? Might not be as easily detectable for the short-term accounts that get banned within minutes, but anything with history would stick out fairly obviously.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Dale Glass <d...@daleglass.net> wrote: > В сообщении от Вторник 13 апреля 2010 00:52:48 вы написали: > > There's still other facets. For example, the approved viewers get some > > publicity and reputation by being on the approved viewers page, and it > > makes people think that much harder about using sketchy viewers to do > > sketchy things. (And yeah, they have to do one extra sketchy thing, as > > Thomas mentions.) > I don't think it makes a big difference. > > I'm talking about a group with a "FOR THE LULZ!" motto. I don't think they > care much about keeping any account of theirs for very long. > > > > > (As an aside, connecting from the same account and/or same IP with random > > MACs seems pretty obviously strange and detectable. There's a few more > > hoops left to jump through there.) > That will take some work though. At my house there are 5 computers that > could > run a SL client, that's 5 MACs, all behind the same NATed IP address. > Schools, > workplaces, cafes, etc could have hundreds of legitimate ones. > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
