-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Soft, i think perhaps it would be better if there were separated documents each focusing on one single target (developers who distribute, developers who don't, users, content creators etc), having it all mixed together makes the risk of misinterpretation much higher.
On 25/2/2010 19:29, Soft Linden wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Jay Reynolds Freeman > <jay_reynolds_free...@mac.com> wrote: >> >> But what if there is no "third party"? What if I develop a modified version >> of the SL viewer all by myself, and use it to log in to the SL servers, but >> do not distribute either source or binary for it? Since there is no >> additional, "third" party involved in the creation and use of this viewer, >> it would appear that nothing in the "Linden Lab Policy on Third-Party >> Viewers" applies to it or to me. >> > > The FAQ and revised TPV, coming soon, will address this directly. > There are some terms in there that don't apply if you aren't putting > the viewer in the registry, and they will be identified as such. Most > apply to any third-party viewer however, even if you aren't > distributing it. > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuIFlcACgkQ8ZFfSrFHsmWwXwCbBLfNMbJubJ7Nd5QXEFbdlGfw ng4An3tH7kT1S2KDkld3/qnVjKIlHb36 =eJkb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
