Mike Dickson wrote: > Right. Person B has the responsibility to make available or point to an > unrestricted source for the content they upload to Second Life. The > same with GPL'd content. I don't see a reason why LL can't put > restrictions on content distribution within the service. It's the person > who imports the content that has the responsibility to insure that it > meets the distribution requirements under which it's licensed.
That last part is correct, it is person B's responsibility not to distribute the work in a way that places additional restrictions upon it. Providing a URL to an unprotected version is not sufficient, because Person B has no license to distribute a restricted version within Second Life. Including a URL doesn't magically grant them such a license to distribute a version under terms other than the CC-SA allows. -Jason _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
