Paul Durrant writes: > On 3/13/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But the underlying point here is that you don't have to go through ON > > (there are other supported ways to integrate drivers) and you don't > > need to create (and can't actually use) yet another consolidation to > > solve the problem. > > > > Ok, I was unaware that SFW was a vehicle for drivers. Looking at > http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/sfw/usr/src/ one could be > forgiven for thinking it was not, since there is no uts directory.
I see nothing here that precludes it: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/sfwnv/ We have drivers delivered from many consolidations -- not just ON. If SFW needs to avoid the inclusion of drivers for some reason, I think that's something that ought to be discussed over on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Surprisingly, the SFW project has only one 'endorsement,' and that's from the device driver community. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
