--- "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 11, 2007, at 4:03 AM, Christopher Mahan wrote:
> 
> >
> > --- David Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> GPL says:
> >>
> >> "If you want to redistribute MY code you must give me the
> changes
> >> to MY
> >> distribution that YOU have changed and you MUST license YOUR
> code
> >> under
> >> MY license if YOUR code requires a significant proportion of MY
> >> code to
> >> compile or work as specified".
> >
> > Exactly, and here's why:
> >
> > I do 50% of the work, you do 50% of the work, we both enjoy 100%
> of
> > the product. I am not restricting your use of my code as long as
> you
> > allow me to use the code you write alongside it.
> >
> > It's fair. People are much more likely to contribute when they
> know
> > that those who will use their product will also have to share the
> > source code.
> 
> Do you have any data to support that statement?  Projects seem to  
> thrive under all kinds of licenses.

Even proprietary ones.

In FLOSS, perception is reality, Mr. Harmony. Say Hi to Jim Driscoll. 

Chris Mahan
818.943.1850 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.christophermahan.com/


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. 
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to