[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So yeah, this is cool to see, and quite a nice touch.
>>
>> However, it's interesting in some other ways. I note this is 'version 0.6' -
>> which suggest that you're collaborating in forums outside
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the genunix wiki, and obviously the conference calls.
> 
> When the CAB was established we were all issued with surpluss
> ``Clipper Chip'' phones and communication gear :-)
> 
> There's always been a private list which can reach all of us and,
> somehow, we know each others email addresses.
> 
> Also, for con-calls it's kinda nice to be able to send out call
> numbers in private.

Archived so that future board members can benefit from previous discussion?

> 
>> This doesn't really irritate me too much given the sensitive nature of this
>> document, but it's the first evidence that the OGB is using private
>> communication, and I've often wondered (though not too surprised) about 
>> whether
>> this was happening wrt to the governance drafts.
> 
> Some of those meetings allowed anyone to call in and the drafts were
> all exchanged in the open to more people then just the CAB; e.g., Ben
> Rockwood was present for many of those.
> 
> I think, though, that in this case there was only a .5 and a .6; one
> send just before and the other during our meeting just now.
> Email side-channels during meetings are important.

Thanks for the background info, much appreciated.


Glynn
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to