On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Garrett D'Amore <gdam...@sun.com> wrote:
> On 03/ 2/10 03:57 AM, casper....@sun.com wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Garrett D'Amore<gdam...@sun.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm just thinking, isn't it time we just bit the bullet and told our
>>>> users
>>>> to start using the POSIX defaults, instead of continuing to supply the
>>>> legacy compatibility stuff forever.
>>>>
>>
>> I believe a number of scripts requires certain tools from that package so
>> I think we always need to install them; however, I think it is better
>> that we try our level to merge them into the standard location.
>>
>
> And *that* is what I was saying.  I think we should finally adopt the POSIX
> semantics.

Provided it's a reasonable merge. For example, I updated du
(seems like ages ago now) so that the regular and xpg4 versions
both understood -d and -x. There are going to be some differences
that are unavoidable, but allowing the use of common old-fashioned
flags where there aren't conflicts makes transition so much easier.

I haven't looked recently to see how big a problem this is still. What I
do know is that working in a heterogeneous environment (and with
different configurations mixed in) the minor differences in behaviour
drive me up the wall.

-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to