Bruno Jargot wrote: > On 3/7/07, Garrett D'Amore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bruno Jargot wrote: > > > How does BusyBox helps you to reduce the size of the current > > > footprint? Its an All-in-One solution where lots of code gets shared > > > between commands. And a ksh93-based BusyBox requires even less > > > footprint because ksh93 uses less memory than bash. > > > > Huh. BusyBox is orthogonal to bash. It doesn't use bash at all, IIRC, > > but "ash" or some other "limited" shell. > > Huh? I think its a stripped down bash. The shell in BusyBox has all > the bash features, including high memory consumption.
The busybox(1) manual page says it's "ash" based (using "bash" for this purpose would be a huge problem since it consumes far too much memory...) ... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
