How does BusyBox helps you to reduce the size of the current footprint? Its an All-in-One solution where lots of code gets shared between commands. And a ksh93-based BusyBox requires even less footprint because ksh93 uses less memory than bash.
Bruno On 3/7/07, Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 01:44 pm, Bruno Jargot wrote: > You could start creating a solution based on ksh93. I think it may be > a good candidate for a Google Summer of Code project. And how would this help us reduce the size of the current footprint?
_______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
