Perhaps this list can be useful in order to determine what name to use: https://www.era.europa.eu/system/files/2022-11/List%20of%20CCS%20Class%20B%20systems.pdf
According to that list, Sweden is using ATC-2 and ATC-R. While Bulgaria and Portugal are using Ebicab 700:BU and Ebicab 700:PT. Norway is said to be using ATC-2, which is compatible with the Swedish ATC-2. But in Norway, there are some lines that are equipped with the full version, FATC (which I think is the same as the normal implementation of ATC-2 in Sweden), and some lines that only have a partial implementation, DATC. There seems to be some similarities between the Swedish and the Norwegian systems ATC and the Ebicab 700 systems in Portugal and Bulgaria. But I don't think these are compatible. Den ons 19 apr. 2023 kl 19:47 skrev Ross Gammon <[email protected]>: > For me - both pieces of information are interesting. > > TrainProtectionSystem.Name=ATC > > TrainProtectionSystem.Model=ZUB123 > > If it is not possible to tag both pieces of information, is it possible to > leave the tagging as originally specified here: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Train_protection_systems, > in which case Denmark would be tagged with railway:zub123=yes, but then > render it as ATC when the data is viewed? > > That would avoid having to redo any tagging, and keep the useful > information about the equipment type (model) for extraction using other > tools for those interested in that information. > > Cheers, > > Ross > On 19.04.2023 13.10, [email protected] wrote: > > tomasmarklund75＠gmail.com wrote: > > Well, 'ATC' isn't ambigous in Sweden. In Sweden, there is only one ATC, and it > will never be mixed up with japanese or bulgarian ATC. > > Does that mean we should also tag Danish, Bulgarian, or Japanese ATC as > "Railway:atc=yes"? > > > And the system IS called ATC, signs along the track say "ATC begins" or > "ATC ends" or similar, documentation for drivers etc say ATC, documentation on > the Trafikverket website says ATC. ATC everywhere, never Ebicab. So it would > be fairly > confusing to tag the railways with something "no one"* has heard of. Because > of > this, I do NOT vote for changing tags in sweden from ATC to Ebicab. If > something has to be > changed, then ATC-SE is a better choise. > > So why should Danish ATC be tagged ZUB123? All signs say ATC, all driver > documentation say ATC, (almost) no-one has heard about ZUB123. Yet that is > still the tag used for Denmark. > Openrailwaymap mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Archived version of this message: > https://lists.openrailwaymap.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/FT7UORLMVTEINFJTC3ICZ4RQ46FRVTYC/ > Archive of this list: > https://lists.openrailwaymap.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/ > > Openrailwaymap mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Archived version of this message: > https://lists.openrailwaymap.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/U7Y24B2GP6H7WMEPTQUCIJM3WHPVYJPR/ > Archive of this list: > https://lists.openrailwaymap.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/
Openrailwaymap mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Archived version of this message: https://lists.openrailwaymap.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/U5KEUREM27AR7A5PGBLUHHLEEO6RXDNZ/ Archive of this list: https://lists.openrailwaymap.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/
