Am Montag, 1. Juni 2020, 11:13:54 CEST schrieb Rainer: > Hi Maarten, > > I agree that the tags railway:pzb, railway:etcs etc. are chosen > awkwardly. The tag should express that these are train control systems; > now with railway:pzb=* you have to know that pzb is a train control > system. If somewhere in the world the system xyz is added, it is not > recognisable from the tag as train protection. > Therefore I suggest to change railway:pzb|etcs|lzb|atc|...=yes|no into > railway:train_protection:pzb|etcs|lzb|atc|...=yes|no . This would > provide more clarity and make it possible to actively set a > railway:train_protection=no to express that no train protection system > exists and to distinguish it from the lack of information.
How about railway:train_protection=pzb;lzb;etcs railway:train_protection:etcs:level=2 That would be only _one_ key to check. We had this discussion years ago, but I don't remember the outcome anymore. Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
