On Monday 13 December 2010 10:12:57 Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 10:05 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Monday 13 December 2010 10:00:05 Jon Masters wrote: > > > <snip commented out code fixup> > > > > > > > This is bogus ... I'd prefer extending the detection to be able to > > > > identify imx51 in a more precise way. > > > > > > Sure. I was just applying a hack in my local git branch for running the > > > BeagleBoard-xM here with my Flyswatter. That was neither a patch nor > > > intended for use other than with the xM if someone else is using a > > > release of OpenOCD since the beginning of November. I really agree with > > > you that the correct fix is to better determine an IMX51 for fixup. > > > > > > FWIW, I got this wrong at first. I read the archives and assumed that > > > the BeagleBoard was in need of some fixup, but actually it's fine. It's > > > the logic intended to fixup the other part that is breaking Beagle. > > > > Can you try checking how can that be fixed ? I believe it'd just be a > > matter of adding a few more identification information (check how the > > fixup loop detects the CPU, try extending it so it doesn't break > > beagle). > > Sure. I don't have time today, but when I get chance this week I will > take a look at better distinguishing the parts (I have only several of > the Beagles here, but not the offending Freescale part so can send you a > patch to test when I get chance to look at it).
Yes, that'd be cool. I don't mind testing. > > Jon. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
