"Xiaofan Chen" <xiaof...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > I understand your concern. However, if you have a good wiki > and documentations (say put in the comment in the starting > of the config file), then it would not be too bad. Just ask > the user to RTM/RTFM. ;-)
That's not the case of telling somebody to do RTFM, but rather a case of general opinion about software that is around the web. There are a lot of programs that you do not need to look into cfg files and IMHO that's very fine. OpenOCD can be improved that way too, but I'd like to hear maintainter's opinion before I'll try making some patches. > A GUI utility to generate the config file would be nice. A GUI utility to do usual things would be even nicer - specify interface/chip, press "connect", select image file, press "flash" and that's it! > OpenOCD is anyway not that fast and indeed not that > easy to use, compared to IAR/J-Link... This can be improved! But every maintainer must want that too. I think making OpenOCD more user-friendly and having SWD support would be a major brakthrough for it, bot I think nothing is going on in those areas... 4\/3!! _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
