On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> I'm not crazy about adding another code path for an aging part... >> >> Thoughts? > > Why not make improvements as long as it's still supported?
We have something that is slow and tested today. Switching to something potentially faster and untested is not an improvement. I'm not saying that the code is untested, I'm saying that I'd like to *know* that it works before I commit it. This particular patch has been tricky in the past w.r.t. what the correct timeout handling is across adapters... -- Øyvind Harboe US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
