Øyvind Harboe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:59 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Fredrik Hederstierna wrote: >>> This is the patch that fix the timeout issue: >> I think we'll hold this until the 0.5 merge window opens, >> to make sure it gets enough testing. > > I'm loathe to add codepaths to particular targets unless there > is a *huge* upside and it is sure to get enough testing... > > W.r.t. testing there is evidence that this target does not > get enough testing to justify the luxury of extra optimized > codepaths... especially for some aging part.... perhaps > a rock solid & slow code path is the way to go while this > part rides into the sunset? >
The str9 gets quite a bit of testing, i mentioned in the previous bugfix that the time-outs were probably to blame for the error's edgar saw. I am guessing but it may be that your silicon has had a few erases and as such the erase time has extended a little. But there is no harm in waiting for the next release before merging this patch. Cheers Spen _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
