On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:08 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Tuesday 26 January 2010, David Brownell wrote: >> > No, I haven't checked the buffer. Do you suspect GDB to have a problem ? >> > This test is on my to do list for tomorrow.
The buffer looks OK: (gdb) x/64x buffer 0x8150f0d <gdb_packet_buffer.8757+13>: 0x36 0x00 0x00 0xea 0x18 0xf0 0x9f 0xe5 0x8150f15 <gdb_packet_buffer.8757+21>: 0x18 0xf0 0x9f 0xe5 0x18 0xf0 0x9f 0xe5 0x8150f1d <gdb_packet_buffer.8757+29>: 0x18 0xf0 0x9f 0xe5 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x8150f25 <gdb_packet_buffer.8757+37>: 0x18 0xf0 0x9f 0xe5 0x18 0xf0 0x9f 0xe5 0x8150f2d <gdb_packet_buffer.8757+45>: 0xe0 0x00 0xf0 0x87 0x98 0x08 0xf0 0x87 0x8150f35 <gdb_packet_buffer.8757+53>: 0xbc 0x08 0xf0 0x87 0xe8 0x08 0xf0 0x87 0x8150f3d <gdb_packet_buffer.8757+61>: 0x04 0x09 0xf0 0x87 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x8150f45 <gdb_packet_buffer.8757+69>: 0x1c 0x0a 0xf0 0x87 0xe4 0x09 0xf0 0x87 compared to: hexdump -C -n 64 install/bin/redboot.bin 00000000 36 00 00 ea 18 f0 9f e5 18 f0 9f e5 18 f0 9f e5 |6...............| 00000010 18 f0 9f e5 00 00 00 00 18 f0 9f e5 18 f0 9f e5 |................| 00000020 e0 00 f0 87 98 08 f0 87 bc 08 f0 87 e8 08 f0 87 |................| 00000030 04 09 f0 87 00 00 00 00 1c 0a f0 87 e4 09 f0 87 |................| Edgar -- Edgar Grimberg System Developer Zylin AS ZY1000 JTAG Debugger http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html Phone: (+47) 51 63 25 00 _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development