On Sunday 27 December 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > I can't test the code anytime soon, but it looks OK to me so I > think you should commit it if you've run tests on it.
My thoughts exactly. Done. > I would like the same padding logic added to flash erase_address > to restore that functionality. > > Qualified by an "pad" option to round up/down to nearest sector boundary, > if you prefer. I'll think about that. Any such dangerous "erase extra stuff" should certainly not be a default behavior, when someone has gone through the effort to specify exactly the address range they want to erase! - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
