Øyvind Harboe wrote: > Now, there is a small problem you pointed out: that two elf images > that are "too close together" won't work with the flash write > image erase option, but here the user can use flash erase_address > range in one pass and then multiple invocations of flash > write_image, so I think we should just ignore this problem > as we have up until now and nobody raised the problem. > Agreed. I do not think this case is really relevant. In all cases I have seen until now, images always have separate sectors, never two images sharing one sector - because sharing a sector will damage the second image if the first is upgraded in-system and power fails.
If such a case really is needed, the separate erase should be enough. cu Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
