> > Please search on mailing list archive, people already lost too much > time discussion about it. >
I second this. There was a nice discussion about how the developers of OpenOCD tend to be more comfortable in C because of the embedded work they do. In addition, OpenOCD is built to run on some embedded systems as well as normal desktops. In the end, the overhead might be a bit much to actually push to something like C++. At the same time, I completely agree with the sentiment. There has also been a lot of discussion about function stubs and overriding functions that lead us down the road of OO programming. OpenOCD still does that, but in a C sort of way. You don't need C++ :). By the way, you should look at the recent discussion by Zach and some others about abstracting commands so that they aren't specific to a language like TCL. It may be sometime in the future OpenOCD can be configured with TCL and LUA just for fun. // Dean Glazeski
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
