Hi Pieter, On 12/9/09, Pieter Conradie <pieter.conra...@psitek.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > <Flamewar protection on> > > I just glance at the mailing list chatter, so please excuse if my > suggestion/comment is completely off the wall/misinformed/completely wrong > and please ignore it if that's the case. > > I get the impression that you (the developers) are butting your head against > the limitations of C. Why don't you finish development to get a stable C > version of OpenOCD working and then design an object-orientated C++ > architecture with all of the experience and insights that you have gained so > far? I'm thinking that the abstraction and encapsulation will do a lot to > clean up the code and make the architecture flexible/expandable. > > Also, it would be nice if you switched to a human readable scripting > language, i.e. Lua :) > > </Flamewar protection on> >
hum, here your flamewar protection is off (just joking) ;-) Please search on mailing list archive, people already lost too much time discussion about it. If we need an OO language, then I want to suggest .Net C# (joking again) Best Regards, Alan _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
