On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Zach Welch <z...@superlucidity.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 09:45 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> > Hm - I'm with David here: I am not very fond of re-inventing parts of >> > gdb to include it in OpenOCD. >> > >> > Fully implementing this would make OpenOCD depend on libbfd just for >> > crash reports - this is ridiculous. >> >> If something like this was added, it should not create any >> dependencies or do anything remotely exotic. >> >> How about adding an option to statically link with GDB or create >> a script that launched OpenOCD via GDB as default? > > No one was talking about linking with GDB. That's just insane. ;) > libbfd is part of binutils. But again it should be_optional.
OK. Explain the benefit of complicating OpenOCD vs. adding a script to launch OpenOCD via GDB then... -- Øyvind Harboe US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
