On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 09:45 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > Hm - I'm with David here: I am not very fond of re-inventing parts of > > gdb to include it in OpenOCD. > > > > Fully implementing this would make OpenOCD depend on libbfd just for > > crash reports - this is ridiculous. > > If something like this was added, it should not create any > dependencies or do anything remotely exotic. > > How about adding an option to statically link with GDB or create > a script that launched OpenOCD via GDB as default?
No one was talking about linking with GDB. That's just insane. ;) libbfd is part of binutils. But again it should be_optional. --Z _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
