On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 12:47 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 27 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > > > And what might have caused "nand list" output to repeat? As if > > > the command got called twice... > > Saw the same with "arm reg". Do all commands repeat their output?
All not-top-level commands, yes. I will post the fix shortly. > > > > nand list > > > #0: NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit (Micron) pagesize: 2048, buswidth: 8, > > > blocksize: 131072, blocks: 8192 > > > #1: NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit (Micron) pagesize: 2048, buswidth: 8, > > > blocksize: 131072, blocks: 8192 > > > #0: NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit (Micron) pagesize: 2048, buswidth: 8, > > > blocksize: 131072, blocks: 8192 > > > #1: NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit (Micron) pagesize: 2048, buswidth: 8, > > > blocksize: 131072, blocks: 8192 > > > > > > > exit > > > > > > > Great question. I'll look at this regression, though it looks like that > > command "wants" to return the same format as the 'flash banks' command > > (i.e. as a list that can be further manipulated in TCL). > > Didn't do so before... Yup. :) > > Would it be > > preferable to fix this issue by rewriting it in such terms? > > As part of a wholesale effort to make sure every command's output can > be manipulated in TCL, and to separately document the "native" format > and the TCL-reformatters? Sure. But not just for this commands; > let's just fix the regression. Yeah. That is a separate patch, for sure. --Z _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
