On Friday 27 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > > And what might have caused "nand list" output to repeat? As if > > the command got called twice...
Saw the same with "arm reg". Do all commands repeat their output? > > > nand list > > #0: NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit (Micron) pagesize: 2048, buswidth: 8, > > blocksize: 131072, blocks: 8192 > > #1: NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit (Micron) pagesize: 2048, buswidth: 8, > > blocksize: 131072, blocks: 8192 > > #0: NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit (Micron) pagesize: 2048, buswidth: 8, > > blocksize: 131072, blocks: 8192 > > #1: NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit (Micron) pagesize: 2048, buswidth: 8, > > blocksize: 131072, blocks: 8192 > > > > > exit > > > > Great question. I'll look at this regression, though it looks like that > command "wants" to return the same format as the 'flash banks' command > (i.e. as a list that can be further manipulated in TCL). Didn't do so before... > Would it be > preferable to fix this issue by rewriting it in such terms? As part of a wholesale effort to make sure every command's output can be manipulated in TCL, and to separately document the "native" format and the TCL-reformatters? Sure. But not just for this commands; let's just fix the regression. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
