On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:38, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:14 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> > On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Ųyvind Harboe wrote: >>> >> I've pushed the new etm commands from Michael Bruck. They >>> >> are ready for testing now. I suppose they may find another final >>> >> form, but at least we have the lower level code in place... >>> > >>> > I was *really* hoping to have at least a little discussion >>> > on the list *BEFORE* such changes get rushed into the tree. >>> >>> Me as well but I didn't see any replies to Michaels postings. >>> >>> https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-October/012152.html >> >> I don't believe I even saw that.... >> >> >>> The patch has the lower level code in place + a few commands >>> to test those lower level fn's. >>> >>> I think it would make perfect sense to toss out the arm11 etm specific >>> commands and hook it up to some more general mechanism >>> when that mechanism surfaces. Meanwhile to be able to test >>> the low level code makes sense to me. >> >> Actually, providing something that doesn't hook up to the >> existing ETM support seems wrong to me. >
It is merely an additional feature that does not preclude anyone from integrating arm11 into the openocd etm/etb drivers. Michael _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
