On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:35 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:14 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> > On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Ųyvind Harboe wrote: >> >> I've pushed the new etm commands from Michael Bruck. They >> >> are ready for testing now. I suppose they may find another final >> >> form, but at least we have the lower level code in place... >> > >> > I was *really* hoping to have at least a little discussion >> > on the list *BEFORE* such changes get rushed into the tree. >> >> Me as well but I didn't see any replies to Michaels postings. >> >> https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-October/012152.html > > I don't believe I even saw that.... > > >> The patch has the lower level code in place + a few commands >> to test those lower level fn's. >> >> I think it would make perfect sense to toss out the arm11 etm specific >> commands and hook it up to some more general mechanism >> when that mechanism surfaces. Meanwhile to be able to test >> the low level code makes sense to me. > > Actually, providing something that doesn't hook up to the > existing ETM support seems wrong to me.
OK, I'll take your word on that you know more about these things. Will the arm11 low level code be useful none-the-less? -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
